HAVANA, Oct. 2th Cuba’s primary connection to the global Internet is through the ALBA-1 undersea cable linking landing points on the south-east shore of the island to Venezuela and Jamaica; however, the bulk of Cuban traffic originates in Havana which is on the north-west coast.
Traffic from Havana and other cities in the west travels over a backbone to reach the cable landing points. A landing point near Havana would reduce the load on the backbone, speeding connections, providing redundancy, and saving capital investment.
At one time, there seemed to be bipartisan support in the U.S. for improving Cuban Internet access. During his second term, President Obama pursued detente with Cuba, and much of that effort was focused on the role of the Internet and undersea cable connectivity was part of the plan.
Daniel Sepulveda, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and U.S. Coordinator for International Communications and Information Policy, who led two U.S. government delegations to Cuba during the Obama administration, said there were at least a half-dozen proposals — from U.S. and non-US companies — to construct a north-south undersea cable between the U.S. and Cuba. There had even been discussion of one day allowing Cuban access to the US cable at Guantanamo, GTMO-1.
At first, Trump seemed to agree — consider the following timeline:
- October 20, 2017, The State Department issued National Security Presidential Memorandum, NSPM-5, stating that it was our policy to “Amplify efforts to support the Cuban people through the expansion of internet services” and directing government departments and agencies “to examine the technological challenges and opportunities for expanding internet access in Cuba.”
- January 22, 2018, The State Department established a Cuba Internet Task Force “to examine technological challenges and opportunities for expanding internet access in Cuba.” (Disclosure — The Task Force formed two sub-committees and I was a member of both).
- July 23, 2018, The consortium that owns the ARCOS cable applied to construct a branch from the cable to an ETECSA supplied cable landing spot in Cojimar, Cuba.
- August 10, 2018, The FCC found the application “to be acceptable for filing and subject to the streamlined processing procedures” obligating them to take action “within forty-five (45) days” unless upon “further examination” the application is “deemed ineligible for streamlined processing.”
Well, it seems the application must have been deemed ineligible since as far as I know nothing happened until earlier this month when The Committee for the Assessment of Foreign Participation in the United States Telecommunications Services Sector (CAFPUSTSS), which Trump established in an executive order on April 4, 2020, notified the FCC that it is planning to conduct 120-day security reviews of the ARCOS application.
I reached out to the FCC and the attorney who filed the request for the cable branch to ask why the application had not been acted upon but got no reply. I can think of two possible explanations:
- Trump changed his policy with respect to Cuban Internet connectivity without, as far as I know, telling anyone.
- Trump held this application up in order to grab a Florida headline between now and the election when the CAFPUSTSS rejects the application showing how tough he is on Cuba in an effort to win Cuban and Venezuelan votes.
I’m unfamiliar with FCC procedures and workflow — is there another explanation?
Finally, note that on March 15, 2018, Deep Blue Cable Inc. applied for a Caribbean cable with 19 landing points. While none of those were in Cuba, they planned a second phase with two Cuban landing points, but the Deep Blue application was withdrawn on November 11, 2019.
( www.circleid.com )